Lately there have been a lot
of comments made about the quality and quantity of book reviews on sites like
Amazon. There is a general discussion
among writers and professional reviewers about authors who may be writing
reviews for their own work under a pseudonym.
If this is true, it’s a shame because it diminishes the words of a true
book lover who reviews books as a profession and the words of every day
readers. I’ve been wondering then, why
do we care so much about reviews and who really benefits from them? Do we need professional reviewers, or should
writers only insist that their customers post book reviews? Which are more necessary? Which are more, dare I say it,
legitimate?
Being a voracious reader
myself, easily breezing through over 300 books a year, it wasn’t until I began
to interact and speak to authors that I recognized that I could write a pretty
decent review if I put my mind to it.
So, that’s what I did. Once I
became the host for Authors on the Air, an internet radio talk show, I wrote
reviews more seriously, as I wanted authors to know that I had actually read
their books and understood their style and POV.
Since my early days of posting my reviews as simply a “consumer”, I have
established rules for myself as a more “professional” reviewer. I will not write a review that won’t garner
less than 3 stars; I will always be honest as my credibility is as stake; and I
will never review a book because an author simply asks me to. I ran into an ethical dilemma there and have
blogged previously about it.
On my Facebook page for
Authors on the Air as well as my personal page I recommend books to my friends
and that got me thinking about reviews.
My friend followed my advice to read a Brett Battles book and she loved
it. I suggested that she write exactly
that same statement on Amazon, where she purchased the book and thought that
her comments might be more appreciated by the author than those of a
professional reviewer. Interestingly
enough, Brett posted that he agreed.
So, what do you want, authors? I know you like those long wordy reviews we love to spout out and yes, they do help, I think, to perhaps guide sales of your books, however marginally. But does that diminish the impact of the everyday reader who takes the time to write “hey, I’ve never done this before but…I loved your book?” Which would you rather see?
And readers, which review
would you reply most upon? The review
that’s rather long and and wordy or would you prefer to see what the “average
Jane” has to say about an author’s work?
And, do reviews really matter?
# # #
